AI researches
A human verifies sources, interprets context and decides what matters.
C.I.S. AI Capability System
Identify where AI could create useful capacity, what must remain human and which foundations need attention before implementation.
Begin with context
Your context changes what counts as useful, responsible and proportionate.
Human Intelligence Gates
Every proposed use should state where machine assistance stops and accountable human judgement begins.
A human verifies sources, interprets context and decides what matters.
A human checks omissions, framing, permissions and cultural meaning.
An authorised person examines the evidence and makes the decision.
A named owner reviews the output, consequences and exception route.
C.I.S. 90-Day AI Intelligence Roadmap
Clarify the problem, establish boundaries and test the highest-value assumption.
Develop the smallest useful workflow, knowledge structure and human review process.
Review evidence, strengthen governance, build capability and decide what should scale.
Companion long-form insight
Go deeper into the evidence, principles and practical decisions behind the diagnostic—from Human Intelligence Gates and workforce capability to knowledge readiness, cultural context and the smallest useful AI intervention.
Read Don’t Start With AI: Start With the Problem ↗A proportionate service ladder
The right route depends on the problem, evidence, risk and organisational capacity. A diagnostic should not automatically become an implementation project.
A preliminary view across six readiness dimensions.
A human-reviewed assessment of priorities, evidence, risks and responsible starting points.
Discuss this review ↗A focused engagement to test one valuable, bounded AI opportunity.
A proportionate route to prove, build and embed capability.
Reliable organisational knowledge and role-specific AI support.
Governed integration into real work, with checks and ownership.
Ongoing research, improvement, governance and strategic support.
Boundaries and safeguards
CIS helps organisations clarify purpose, readiness, human value, cultural consequences and proportionate tests. Final responsibility remains with the organisation and its authorised decision-makers.